January 18, 2012
John Davies, the Chief Executive of Wikimedia UK - the umbrella foundation in charge of Wikipedia - said the site's unprecedented blackout was a tough decision to make, but a necessary one in the bid to raise global awareness.
“We’re not happy we’ve done it – but we think it’s a very important thing to do”, Davies told RT. The blackout is central to showing Internet users "the threat to the liberty of freedom of speech and information that these two bills in American Congress pose.”
The unheard of protest measure is causing a global stir. With the day-long blackout of its English site, Wikipedia is not alone: popular sites like Mozilla, Reddit, BoingBoing, WordPress, TwitPic and others have joined the fight.
The web-wide protest is a shocking move for a rather young, disorganized and apolitical industry that has until now preferred the virtual world to Capitol Hill. But does it stand a chance against big shots like the US Chamber of Commerce and the Motion Picture Association of America?
John Davies believes the blackout has already achieved a very important goal: to get the debate going. “We’ve been talking about this for weeks and weeks in America, in Congress, trying to get people to understand that this may have some good intentions, this bill, but the actual effects of it will be to crush sites like Wikipedia.”
And according to the Wikimedia Chief Executive, the fact that the Wiki community reached the decision for a blackout democratically is a clear indicator that people are listening.
Source of text:
You might wish to visit these sites to learn more about SOPA: