IoM and BiopiracyBy Steve Green
Food Freedom News, April 14, 2012
Past the adjectives is important information undermining the independence of the Institute of Medicine and its “authority” to make any statements on vaccines. It is tied to the military, funded by governmental agencies, Bill Gates and junk food corporations like Pepsi and Kraft, and the pharmaceutical industry, including Merck, Pfizer, GSK and Eli Lilly, along with food giants, Monsanto, Cargill and ConAgra.
In the video below, vaccine rights attorney Patricia Finn reports being threatened with criminal charges; New York State demands she surrender names of all clients.
Here is background: http://www.rense.com/general7/gw.htm
Why is it significant that many of Bush’s staff and cabinet appointees are former pharmaceutical company executives as was GW’s father, former President George Bush? These corporations are voraciously patenting Earth’s life forms — its plants, bacteria, viruses, animals and even human genetic lineages. Reproduction of plants, animals and humans may eventually be totally controlled by these corporations, genetically-altered, recombined into chimeric life forms and exploited for profit.
There are two issues with vaccines that upend the idea that they are for health.
They contain an incontrovertible sterilizing agent, incontrovertible because it is the “preferred ingredient” in a pharma patent entitled “A fertility impairing vaccine.” http://organichealthadviser.com/archives/polysorbate-80-in-swine-flu-vaccines-infertility-in-humans
They contaminate DNA with genetically engineered PATENTED intellectual property, thus are a form of theft. And none of the legal issues of what claims might be laid against the bodies of those who are “stuck” with this patented material, have been answered. The refusal could be on commercial grounds. http://foodfreedomgroup.com/2012/03/03/intl-womens-day-women-reclaim-their-stewardship-of-life-reject-gmos-gmo-vaccines/
The intellectual property issue raises the question of deceptive trade practices, vaccines as a form of biopiracy. The new DNA vaccines use the same method Monsanto uses to genetically seeds. http://coto2.wordpress.com/2011/07/17/murdoch-and-vaccines-exposure-of-murdochs-crimes-expose-a-much-larger-story/
And currently, Monsanto is being sued by India for biopiracy.
Neither the sterilizing ingredient or the intellectual property being shot into people without their consent, can be denied. Both are patent issues. It is clear from the fertility impairing vaccine patent that pharma anticipates making money from sterilizing people (and that ingredient is in ALL the mandated vaccines for children and in the seasonal flu vaccine). And it is clear that what is being shot into people is patented material covered under intellectual property rights and that people are not being asked to consent to sign away their property rights first.
Neither issues requires one to argue “science.” The issues are the right not to be covertly sterilized (see section on Kissinger’s plan for exactly that – http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/a-universal-declaration-of-resistance-to-mandatory-vaccinations/ and property rights over one’s own body and genetic lineage as well as physical assault and potentially even rape. (See http://foodfreedomgroup.com/2012/03/03/intl-womens-day-women-reclaim-their-stewardship-of-life-reject-gmos-gmo-vaccines/)
Daniel Ravicher at Cordoza University is a leading one and working with hundreds of lawyers to sue Monsanto over THEIR fields being involuntarily contaminated, simply trying to ensure that Monsanto will not sue them for “stealing” Monsanto’s property. Monsanto is working to block the suit, wishing to be able to sue those they contaminate or to make claims. Will the same be true for pharma over people’s bodies?
Ravicher explains, ”You can only have a patent on something if it is socially useful.”
The CDC’s mandated vaccine schedule of 70 vaccines for US children (2-3 times more than any other country in the world) and the pandemic laws put un place by Bush arrange for forced vaccination (of the population), offering pharma the means to biopiracy over human DNA.
Source of article:
Related: One in 32 Utah boys has autism